[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V10 10/18] x86/ticketlock: Add slowpath logic
x86/ticketlock: Add slowpath logic From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> Maintain a flag in the LSB of the ticket lock tail which indicates whether anyone is in the lock slowpath and may need kicking when the current holder unlocks. The flags are set when the first locker enters the slowpath, and cleared when unlocking to an empty queue (ie, no contention). In the specific implementation of lock_spinning(), make sure to set the slowpath flags on the lock just before blocking. We must do this before the last-chance pickup test to prevent a deadlock with the unlocker: Unlocker Locker test for lock pickup -> fail unlock test slowpath -> false set slowpath flags block Whereas this works in any ordering: Unlocker Locker set slowpath flags test for lock pickup -> fail block unlock test slowpath -> true, kick If the unlocker finds that the lock has the slowpath flag set but it is actually uncontended (ie, head == tail, so nobody is waiting), then it clears the slowpath flag. The unlock code uses a locked add to update the head counter. This also acts as a full memory barrier so that its safe to subsequently read back the slowflag state, knowing that the updated lock is visible to the other CPUs. If it were an unlocked add, then the flag read may just be forwarded from the store buffer before it was visible to the other CPUs, which could result in a deadlock. Unfortunately this means we need to do a locked instruction when unlocking with PV ticketlocks. However, if PV ticketlocks are not enabled, then the old non-locked "add" is the only unlocking code. Note: this code relies on gcc making sure that unlikely() code is out of line of the fastpath, which only happens when OPTIMIZE_SIZE=n. If it doesn't the generated code isn't too bad, but its definitely suboptimal. Thanks to Srivatsa Vaddagiri for providing a bugfix to the original version of this change, which has been folded in. Thanks to Stephan Diestelhorst for commenting on some code which relied on an inaccurate reading of the x86 memory ordering rules. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 2 - arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 3 + arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 6 ++ 5 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h index 7131e12c..401f350 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, PVOP_VCALLEE2(pv_lock_ops.lock_spinning, lock, ticket); } -static __always_inline void ____ticket_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, +static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t ticket) { PVOP_VCALL2(pv_lock_ops.unlock_kick, lock, ticket); diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h index 04a5cd5..d68883d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -1,11 +1,14 @@ #ifndef _ASM_X86_SPINLOCK_H #define _ASM_X86_SPINLOCK_H +#include <linux/jump_label.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/processor.h> #include <linux/compiler.h> #include <asm/paravirt.h> +#include <asm/bitops.h> + /* * Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere * @@ -37,32 +40,28 @@ /* How long a lock should spin before we consider blocking */ #define SPIN_THRESHOLD (1 << 15) -#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS +extern struct static_key paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled; +static __always_inline bool static_key_false(struct static_key *key); -static __always_inline void __ticket_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, - __ticket_t ticket) +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS + +static inline void __ticket_enter_slowpath(arch_spinlock_t *lock) { + set_bit(0, (volatile unsigned long *)&lock->tickets.tail); } -static __always_inline void ____ticket_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, - __ticket_t ticket) +#else /* !CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */ +static __always_inline void __ticket_lock_spinning(arch_spinlock_t *lock, + __ticket_t ticket) { } - -#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */ - - -/* - * If a spinlock has someone waiting on it, then kick the appropriate - * waiting cpu. - */ -static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, - __ticket_t next) +static inline void __ticket_unlock_kick(arch_spinlock_t *lock, + __ticket_t ticket) { - if (unlikely(lock->tickets.tail != next)) - ____ticket_unlock_kick(lock, next); } +#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */ + /* * Ticket locks are conceptually two parts, one indicating the current head of * the queue, and the other indicating the current tail. The lock is acquired @@ -76,20 +75,22 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, * in the high part, because a wide xadd increment of the low part would carry * up and contaminate the high part. */ -static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(struct arch_spinlock *lock) +static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) { register struct __raw_tickets inc = { .tail = TICKET_LOCK_INC }; inc = xadd(&lock->tickets, inc); + if (likely(inc.head == inc.tail)) + goto out; + inc.tail &= ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG; for (;;) { unsigned count = SPIN_THRESHOLD; do { - if (inc.head == inc.tail) + if (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == inc.tail) goto out; cpu_relax(); - inc.head = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head); } while (--count); __ticket_lock_spinning(lock, inc.tail); } @@ -101,7 +102,7 @@ static __always_inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) arch_spinlock_t old, new; old.tickets = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets); - if (old.tickets.head != old.tickets.tail) + if (old.tickets.head != (old.tickets.tail & ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG)) return 0; new.head_tail = old.head_tail + (TICKET_LOCK_INC << TICKET_SHIFT); @@ -110,12 +111,49 @@ static __always_inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) return cmpxchg(&lock->head_tail, old.head_tail, new.head_tail) == old.head_tail; } +static inline void __ticket_unlock_slowpath(arch_spinlock_t *lock, + arch_spinlock_t old) +{ + arch_spinlock_t new; + + BUILD_BUG_ON(((__ticket_t)NR_CPUS) != NR_CPUS); + + /* Perform the unlock on the "before" copy */ + old.tickets.head += TICKET_LOCK_INC; + + /* Clear the slowpath flag */ + new.head_tail = old.head_tail & ~(TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG << TICKET_SHIFT); + + /* + * If the lock is uncontended, clear the flag - use cmpxchg in + * case it changes behind our back though. + */ + if (new.tickets.head != new.tickets.tail || + cmpxchg(&lock->head_tail, old.head_tail, + new.head_tail) != old.head_tail) { + /* + * Lock still has someone queued for it, so wake up an + * appropriate waiter. + */ + __ticket_unlock_kick(lock, old.tickets.head); + } +} + static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) { - __ticket_t next = lock->tickets.head + TICKET_LOCK_INC; + if (TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG && + static_key_false(¶virt_ticketlocks_enabled)) { + arch_spinlock_t prev; + + prev = *lock; + add_smp(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC); + + /* add_smp() is a full mb() */ - __add(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC, UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX); - __ticket_unlock_kick(lock, next); + if (unlikely(lock->tickets.tail & TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG)) + __ticket_unlock_slowpath(lock, prev); + } else + __add(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC, UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX); } static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h index e96fcbd..4f1bea1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h @@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS #define __TICKET_LOCK_INC 2 +#define TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG ((__ticket_t)1) #else #define __TICKET_LOCK_INC 1 +#define TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG ((__ticket_t)0) #endif #if (CONFIG_NR_CPUS < (256 / __TICKET_LOCK_INC)) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c index 4251c1d..bbb6c73 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ */ #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/jump_label.h> #include <asm/paravirt.h> @@ -15,3 +16,5 @@ struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = { }; EXPORT_SYMBOL(pv_lock_ops); +struct static_key paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled); diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c index ac8f592..3ebabde 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c @@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ static void xen_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want) /* Only check lock once pending cleared */ barrier(); + /* Mark entry to slowpath before doing the pickup test to make + sure we don't deadlock with an unlocker. */ + __ticket_enter_slowpath(lock); + /* check again make sure it didn't become free while we weren't looking */ if (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == want) { @@ -256,6 +260,8 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) return; } + static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_ticketlocks_enabled); + pv_lock_ops.lock_spinning = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_lock_spinning); pv_lock_ops.unlock_kick = xen_unlock_kick; } _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |