[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] xen/arm: Physical IRQ is not always equal to virtual IRQ
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> When Xen needs to EOI a physical IRQ, we must use the IRQ number in irq_desc instead of the virtual IRQ. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index 177560e..0fee3f2 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static void gic_irq_eoi(void *info) static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *regs) { - int i = 0, virq; + int i = 0, virq, pirq; uint32_t lr; struct vcpu *v = current; uint64_t eisr = GICH[GICH_EISR0] | (((uint64_t) GICH[GICH_EISR1]) << 32); @@ -846,6 +846,7 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r /* Assume only one pcpu needs to EOI the irq */ cpu = p->desc->arch.eoi_cpu; eoi = 1; + pirq = p->desc->irq; } list_del_init(&p->inflight); spin_unlock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock); @@ -854,10 +855,10 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r /* this is not racy because we can't receive another irq of the * same type until we EOI it. */ if ( cpu == smp_processor_id() ) - gic_irq_eoi((void*)(uintptr_t)virq); + gic_irq_eoi((void*)(uintptr_t)pirq); else on_selected_cpus(cpumask_of(cpu), - gic_irq_eoi, (void*)(uintptr_t)virq, 0); + gic_irq_eoi, (void*)(uintptr_t)pirq, 0); } i++; -- 1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |