[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 8/8] libxl, hvmloader: Don't relocate memory for MMIO hole
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Hao, Xudong wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of George Dunlap > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:47 PM > > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Keir Fraser; Ian Campbell; Hanweidong; George Dunlap; Stefano > > Stabellini; > > Ian Jackson > > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 8/8] libxl, hvmloader: Don't relocate memory > > for > > MMIO hole > > > > At the moment, qemu-xen can't handle memory being relocated by > > hvmloader. This may happen if a device with a large enough memory > > region is passed through to the guest. At the moment, if this > > happens, then at some point in the future qemu will crash and the > > domain will hang. (qemu-traditional is fine.) > > > > It's too late in the release to do a proper fix, so we try to do > > damage control. > > > > hvmloader already has mechanisms to relocate memory to 64-bit space if > > it can't make a big enough MMIO hole. By default this is 2GiB; if we > > just refuse to make the hole bigger if it will overlap with guest > > memory, then the relocation will happen by default. > > > > For qemu-xen use case, hvmloader start MMIO hole at 0xf0000000. However, > qemu-xen initialize ram region to 0xf0000000(HVM_BELOW_4G_RAM_END) below 4G, > and pci hole starting from 0xe0000000, is it overlap? hvmloader configures the MMIO hole to start at 0xf0000000, qemu-xen configures the below_4g_mem_size ram region to *end* at 0xf0000000 and the pci hole to start from 0xf0000000. It's all coherent now. The patch to modify the pci hole in qemu-xen and have it start at 0xe0000000 has been reverted. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |