[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter
>>> On 27.06.13 at 17:02, Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Change the function definitions of acpi_os_prepare_sleep() and > acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep() to pass along the new extended sleep > parameter. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rafaell J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > index e721863..0251c9b 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_in_debugger); > extern char line_buf[80]; > #endif /*ENABLE_DEBUGGER */ > > -static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_ctrl, > - u32 pm1b_ctrl); > +static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b, > + bool extended); So from here till patch 5 the build will be half broken because of the type mismatches? I think at least the types of the consumers need to be changed in this patch; leaving the meat of the Xen change to patch 4 is perhaps fine. Jan > > static acpi_osd_handler acpi_irq_handler; > static void *acpi_irq_context; > @@ -1757,13 +1757,13 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_terminate(void) > return AE_OK; > } > > -acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control, > - u32 pm1b_control) > +acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b, > + u8 extended) > { > int rc = 0; > if (__acpi_os_prepare_sleep) > - rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state, > - pm1a_control, pm1b_control); > + rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state, val_a, val_b, > + extended); > if (rc < 0) > return AE_ERROR; > else if (rc > 0) > @@ -1772,8 +1772,8 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 > pm1a_control, > return AE_OK; > } > > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, > - u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl)) > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, > + u32 val_b, bool extended)) > { > __acpi_os_prepare_sleep = func; > } > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h > index 709a2f2..26f9996 100644 > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h > @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct device > *dev, > #endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, > - u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl)); > +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, > + u32 val_b, bool extended)); > #ifdef CONFIG_X86 > void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size); > #else > @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static inline void > arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, > } > #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */ > #else > -#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while > (0) > +#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, val_a, val_b, ext) do { } while (0) > #endif > > #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) > -- > 1.7.9.5 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |