[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] xen_disk: support "direct-io-safe" backend option
On 28/06/13 17:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:Support backend option "direct-io-safe". This is documented as follows in the Xen backend specification: * direct-io-safe * Values: 0/1 (boolean) * Default Value: 0 * * The underlying storage is not affected by the direct IO memory * lifetime bug. See: * http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-12/msg01154.html * * Therefore this option gives the backend permission to use * O_DIRECT, notwithstanding that bug. * * That is, if this option is enabled, use of O_DIRECT is safe, * in circumstances where we would normally have avoided it as a * workaround for that bug. This option is not relevant for all * backends, and even not necessarily supported for those for * which it is relevant. A backend which knows that it is not * affected by the bug can ignore this option. * * This option doesn't require a backend to use O_DIRECT, so it * should not be used to try to control the caching behaviour. Also, BDRV_O_NATIVE_AIO is ignored if BDRV_O_NOCACHE, so clarify the default flags passed to the qemu block layer. The original proposal for a "cache" backend option has been dropped because it was believed too wide, especially considering that at the moment the backend doesn't have a way to tell the toolstack that it is capable of supporting it. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>George, should I go ahead and commit to the qemu-xen tree? Yes, I think it's pretty important to have the override in there: Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |