Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 4/9] xen/arm: Implement get_maximum_gpfn hypercall for arm

[Jaeyong Yoo <jaeyong.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >
> > Rather than implementing p2m_get_next_non_used_gpfn, I think we should
> > keep track of the maximum gpfn, like we do on x86, see:
> 
> ISTR Tim wanting to get rid of this concept on x86.
> 
> Anything which is walking the P2M should be doing so via iterator based
> interfaces and not by looping on O...N where N is potentially guest
> controlled. Not to mention 0...N might be quite sparse.
> 

I guess we are now going to implment via iterator?


Jaeyong


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel