[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter
>>> On 09.07.13 at 16:48, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dom0 has been both - but there is nothing wrong with seperating these > two labels. And therein I was thinking that the 'hardware backend domain' > should be the introduced. I am not good with names so the best option > seems CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILIGED, but that sounds to be like 'controlling > domain'. > > Any good ideas for names? CONFIG_XEN_HARDWARE_DOMAIN ? > CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILIGED_DOMAIN? Following the naming in the hypervisor, CONFIG_XEN_HARDWARE_DOMAIN and CONFIG_XEN_CONTROL_DOMAIN would seem reasonable to me. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |