Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.2.2 / KVM / VirtualBox benchmark on Haswell

[Ian Murray <murrayie@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
> From: Thanos Makatos <thanos.makatos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "lars.kurth@xxxxxxx" <lars.kurth@xxxxxxx>; "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 16:40
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.2.2 / KVM / VirtualBox benchmark on Haswell
> 
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
>>  bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lars Kurth
>>  Sent: 09 July 2013 16:28
>>  To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.2.2 / KVM / VirtualBox benchmark on Haswell
>> 
>>  Not sure whether anyone has seen this:
>>  http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_haswell_virtua
>>  lization
>> 
>>  Some of the comments are interesting, but not really as negative as
>>  they used to be. In any case, it may make sense to have a quick look
>> 
>>  Lars
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Xen-devel mailing list
>>  Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 
> They use PostMark for their disk I/O tests, which is an ancient benchmark.

is that a good or a bad thing? If so, why?

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel