[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V9 0/19] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
On 07/11/2013 03:18 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:43:03PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:On 07/10/2013 04:03 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: [...] trimmedYes. you are right. dynamic ple window was an attempt to solve it. Probelm is, reducing the SPIN_THRESHOLD is resulting in excess halt exits in under-commits and increasing ple_window may be sometimes counter productive as it affects other busy-wait constructs such as flush_tlb AFAIK. So if we could have had a dynamically changing SPIN_THRESHOLD too, that would be nice.Gleb, Andrew, I tested with the global ple window change (similar to what I posted here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/11/14 ),This does not look global. It changes PLE per vcpu.Okay. Got it. I was thinking it would change the global value. But IIRC It is changing global sysfs value and per vcpu ple_window. Sorry. I missed this part yesterday.Yes, it changes sysfs value but this does not affect already created vcpus.But did not see good result. May be it is good to go with per VM ple_window. Gleb, Can you elaborate little more on what you have in mind regarding per VM ple_window. (maintaining part of it as a per vm variable is clear to me), but is it that we have to load that every time of guest entry?Only when it changes, shouldn't be to often no?Ok. Thinking how to do. read the register and writeback if there need to be a change during guest entry?Why not do it like in the patch you've linked? When value changes write it to VMCS of the current vcpu. Yes. can be done. So the running vcpu's ple_window gets updated only after next pl-exit. right? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |