[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/4] xen-gnt: prevent adding duplicate gnt callbacks
On 11/07/13 15:17, David Vrabel wrote: > On 08/07/13 14:03, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >> With the current implementation, the callback in the tail of the list >> can be added twice, because the check done in >> gnttab_request_free_callback is bogus, callback->next can be NULL if >> it is the last callback in the list. If we add the same callback twice >> we end up with an infinite loop, were callback == callback->next. >> >> Replace this check with a proper one that iterates over the list to >> see if the callback has already been added. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/xen/grant-table.c | 13 +++++++++++-- >> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c >> index 04c1b2d..d5418c1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c >> +++ b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c >> @@ -729,9 +729,18 @@ void gnttab_request_free_callback(struct >> gnttab_free_callback *callback, >> void (*fn)(void *), void *arg, u16 count) >> { >> unsigned long flags; >> + struct gnttab_free_callback *cb; >> + >> spin_lock_irqsave(&gnttab_list_lock, flags); >> - if (callback->next) >> - goto out; >> + >> + /* Check if the callback is already on the list */ >> + cb = gnttab_free_callback_list; >> + while (cb) { >> + if (cb == callback) >> + goto out; >> + cb = cb->next; >> + } > > O(N)? IMHO we should not worry _that_ much about having a O(N) search here, the number of elements in the list is probably going to be quite low (5, maybe 10?). That doesn't mean I oppose to changing the free callback list code. > Suggest using the standard list infrastructure, or using something other > than NULL for the end of the list (e.g., gnttab_free_callback_list). > > gnttab_request_free_callback() is also putting the callbacks in the > wrong order -- it should be FIFO not LIFO. Might be nice to fix this as > well. Agree, all this free callback list mechanism is pretty ad-hoc, we should use one of the list types provided by Linux, so bugs like the one I've found can be avoided and we can use a FIFO list. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |