[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need to happen earlier
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:46 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > Due to commit 3683243b ("xen-netfront: use __pskb_pull_tail to ensure > linear area is big enough on RX") xennet_fill_frags() may end up > filling MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 fragments in a receive skb, and only reduce > the fragment count subsequently via __pskb_pull_tail(). That's a > result of xennet_get_responses() allowing a maximum of one more slot to > be consumed (and intermediately transformed into a fragment) if the > head slot has a size less than or equal to RX_COPY_THRESHOLD. > > Hence we need to adjust xennet_fill_frags() to pull earlier if we > reached the maximum fragment count - due to the described behavior of > xennet_get_responses() this guarantees that at least the first fragment > will get completely consumed, and hence the fragment count reduced. > > In order to not needlessly call __pskb_pull_tail() twice, make the > original call conditional upon the pull target not having been reached > yet, and defer the newly added one as much as possible (an alternative > would have been to always call the function right before the call to > xennet_fill_frags(), but that would imply more frequent cases of > needing to call it twice). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (3.6 onwards) > --- > v2: Use skb_add_rx_frag() to keep all accounting fields up to date as > we go (skb->len needing intermediate updating was pointed out by > Wei Liu and David Miller, shinfo->nr_frags needing updating before > calling __pskb_pull_tail() was spotted out by Dion Kant). > > --- > drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 32 +++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > --- 3.11-rc1/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c > +++ 3.11-rc1-xen-netfront-pull-earlier/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c > @@ -286,8 +286,7 @@ no_skb: > break; > } > > - __skb_fill_page_desc(skb, 0, page, 0, 0); > - skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags = 1; > + skb_add_rx_frag(skb, 0, page, 0, 0, PAGE_SIZE); > __skb_queue_tail(&np->rx_batch, skb); > } > > @@ -831,7 +830,6 @@ static RING_IDX xennet_fill_frags(struct > struct sk_buff_head *list) > { > struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb); > - int nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags; > RING_IDX cons = np->rx.rsp_cons; > struct sk_buff *nskb; > > @@ -840,19 +838,21 @@ static RING_IDX xennet_fill_frags(struct > RING_GET_RESPONSE(&np->rx, ++cons); > skb_frag_t *nfrag = &skb_shinfo(nskb)->frags[0]; > > - __skb_fill_page_desc(skb, nr_frags, > - skb_frag_page(nfrag), > - rx->offset, rx->status); > + if (shinfo->nr_frags == MAX_SKB_FRAGS) { > + unsigned int pull_to = NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to; > > - skb->data_len += rx->status; > + BUG_ON(pull_to <= skb_headlen(skb)); > + __pskb_pull_tail(skb, pull_to - skb_headlen(skb)); > + } > + BUG_ON(shinfo->nr_frags >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS); > + > + skb_add_rx_frag(skb, shinfo->nr_frags, skb_frag_page(nfrag), > + rx->offset, rx->status, PAGE_SIZE); > > skb_shinfo(nskb)->nr_frags = 0; > kfree_skb(nskb); > - > - nr_frags++; > } > > - shinfo->nr_frags = nr_frags; > return cons; > } > > @@ -933,7 +933,8 @@ static int handle_incoming_queue(struct > while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(rxq)) != NULL) { > int pull_to = NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to; > > - __pskb_pull_tail(skb, pull_to - skb_headlen(skb)); > + if (pull_to > skb_headlen(skb)) > + __pskb_pull_tail(skb, pull_to - skb_headlen(skb)); > > /* Ethernet work: Delayed to here as it peeks the header. */ > skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev); > @@ -1018,17 +1019,10 @@ err: > > skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0].page_offset = rx->offset; > skb_frag_size_set(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0], rx->status); > - skb->data_len = rx->status; > + skb->len += skb->data_len = rx->status; Of the top of my head I have no confidence in my understanding of what this is actually going to end up assigned to ->len or ->data_len after this. For my benefit, can we do the dumb version please? Also ref CodingStyle: Don't put multiple assignments on a single line either. Kernel coding style is super simple. Avoid tricky expressions. The rest of it looked OK to me. Ian. > > i = xennet_fill_frags(np, skb, &tmpq); > > - /* > - * Truesize is the actual allocation size, even if the > - * allocation is only partially used. > - */ > - skb->truesize += PAGE_SIZE * skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; > - skb->len += skb->data_len; > - > if (rx->flags & XEN_NETRXF_csum_blank) > skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; > else if (rx->flags & XEN_NETRXF_data_validated) > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |