Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] xen: remove evtchn_upcall_mask from interface on ARM

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.07.13 at 15:15, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ typedef unsigned long xen_pfn_t;
>  #define XEN_HAVE_PV_GUEST_ENTRY 1
>  #define COMPAT_HAVE_PV_GUEST_ENTRY 1
>  
> +#define XEN_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK 1
> +#define COMPAT_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK 1

Same here - if needed at all, it ought to start with XEN_. But by
now I'm pretty convinced that this isn't needed in the public
headers.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel