Re: [Xen-devel] [V10 PATCH 00/23]PVH xen: Phase I, Version 10 patches...

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 24/07/2013 02:59, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Keir,
> 
> These V10 patches are in pretty good shape. I've addressed all the
> issues Jan had in previous versions, and jfyi, he and I've been back
> and forth on pretty much every patch in this series. Lot of the patches
> have 'acked' or 'reviewed' tags. Kindly review.

These need to get in the tree now, or they're going to miss yet another
cycle. Hasn't it been two/three years?

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

> Christoph:
> I've made the minor changes you suggested in V9, please review
> patches 20 and 21.
> 
> New in V10: minor changes in 20/21 to not call vmx create and destroy
>             functions, as they are noop for pvh. Also, in patch 16
>             add check to not migrage hvm timers for PVH.
> 
> To repeat from before, these are xen changes to support
> boot of a 64bit PVH domU guest. Built on top of unstable git c/s:
> 704302ce9404c73cfb687d31adcf67094ab5bb53
> 
> The public git tree for this:
>    git clone -n git://oss.oracle.com/git/mrathor/xen.git .
>    git checkout pvh.v10
> 
> Coming in future after this is done, two patchsets:
>     - 1) tools changes and 2) dom0 changes.
> 
> Thanks for all the help,
> Mukesh
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel