[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref doc
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 18:31 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, David Scott wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been working on the Mirage (mini-OS + OCaml runtime) blkback > > implementation. It seems to be working much more happily now but I was a bit > > surprised by the GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref doc -- maybe I misread it. > > > > In ./xen/include/public/grant_table.h it says > > > > /* > > * GNTTABOP_unmap_grant_ref: Destroy one or more grant-reference mappings > > * tracked by <handle>. If <host_addr> or <dev_bus_addr> is zero, that > > * field is ignored. If non-zero, they must refer to a device/host mapping > > * that is tracked by <handle> > > * NOTES: > > * 1. The call may fail in an undefined manner if either mapping is not > > * tracked by <handle>. > > * 3. After executing a batch of unmaps, it is guaranteed that no stale > > * mappings will remain in the device or host TLBs. > > */ > > > > When I read > > "If <host_addr> or <dev_bus_addr> is zero, that field is ignored" > > "The call may fail in an undefined manner if either mapping is not tracked > > by <handle>" > > > > I thought, "great, I'll not bother tracking anything except the handle and > > set > > both fields to zero". However if I set host_addr to zero then my frontend > > complains bitterly > > > > gnttab_stubs.c: WARNING: g.e. 53 still in use! (19) > > > > If I store the host_addr and fill it in during the unmap, everything seems > > to > > work. > > > > So did I misread the doc? Or did it mean exclusive-or i.e. you must fill in > > either one of these two fields? Or have I done something stupid elsewhere > > (always possible)? > > > > If it turns out that I have misread the doc, I'll happily send a patch to > > improve the text (once I'm sure I understand what it should say...) > > From reading the implementation it woudl seem clear that host_addr is > actually needed. In fact I think you need to pass in whatever you passed to the original mapping operation, because op->flags here is not an argument from the unmap call but is actually a reference to the original flags used to make the mapping. So if you made the mapping with GNTMAP_host_map then you need to pass the host_addr on unmap. Likewise if you used GNTMAP_device_map then you need to specify dev_bus_addr. I've added Keir to the CC since he's the ultimate authority on these things. Ian. > In fact: > > if ( (op->host_addr != 0) && (op->flags & GNTMAP_host_map) ) > { > if ( (rc = replace_grant_host_mapping(op->host_addr, > op->frame, op->new_addr, > op->pteval, > op->flags)) < 0 ) > goto unmap_out; > > > no unmapping is done if host_addr is 0. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |