[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: errata 766422: decode thumb store during data abort
Hi, At 16:19 +0100 on 24 Jul (1374682769), Julien Grall wrote: > On 07/24/2013 03:55 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:43 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >> On 23 July 2013 23:16, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Were does this the idea of swapping them come from though? The ARM ARM > >>> seems (see e.g. section A6.3) to describe things in the order they are > >>> in memory -- is doing otherwise not going to end up confusing us? > >> > >> In THUMB set, a 32-bit instruction consisting of two consecutive > >> halfwords (see section A6.1). > >> So the instruction is in "big endian", but Xen will read the word as a > >> "little endian" things. > > > > Are you saying that the 16-bit sub-words are in the opposite order to > > what I would have expected and what seems most natural from a decode > > PoV? > > > Consider the T3 encoding of STR (imm, thumb) from A8.8.203, which is: > > 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Rn | Rt imm12 > > > > (where Rn == bits 0..3 of the first halfword, Rt is 15..12 of the second > > and imm12 is the remainder of the second halfword). > > > > I would have expected that the halfword with the "11111" pattern (which > > identifies this as a 32-bit thumb instruction) would have to come first, > > so the decode knows to look for the second. IOW the halfword with 11111 > > should be at PC and the Rt/imm12 halfword should be at PC+2. Yes. This seems to be pretty much explicit in section A6.1 -- you can read 16 bits and decide from those whether you need to read another 16. "If bits [15:11] of the halfword being decoded take any of the following values, the halfword is the first halfword of a 32-bit instruction" > > So if we > > copy 4 bytes from guest PC we should end up with things in the order > > given above (and in the manual) and swapping shouldn't be needed. Sadly, no. Instruction memory is always little-endian, but: "The Thumb instruction stream is a sequence of halfword-aligned halfwords. Each Thumb instruction is either a single 16-bit halfword in that stream, or a 32-bit instruction consisting of two consecutive halfwords in that stream." So a 32-bit thumb instruction with bytes ABCD (where byte A is the one with the magic 5-bit pattern) will be stored in memory as a mixed-endian monstrosity: PC: B PC+1: A PC+2: D PC+3: C A little-endian halfword read of PC gives you AB; another halfword read at PC+2 gives CD, and a 32-bit little-endian read gives CDAB. We don't necessarily have to do the bit-shuffling explicitly: we could do thumb32 decode with the shuffle implicit in the layout used for decoding. > uint16_t a[2]; > rc = raw_copy_from_guest(instr, (void * __user)regs->pc, len); You definitely should read exactly the correct number of bytes -- if we are decoding a 16-bit instruction at the end of a page we don't want to trigger a fault by reading 32 bits and crossing a page boundary. Oh, and one other comment that I've already lost the context for: can you please rename the instruction fetch-and-shuffle function to have 'thumb' in its name somewhere? Cheers, Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |