[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
- To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:01:06 -0700
- Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, drjones@xxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gleb@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, agraf@xxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, habanero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ouyang@xxxxxxxxxxx, avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chegu_vinod@xxxxxx, mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srivatsa.vaddagiri@xxxxxxxxx, attilio.rao@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 21:07:32 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 08/06/2013 04:40 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism
> with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides
> implementation for both Xen and KVM.
>
> The current set of patches are for Xen/x86 spinlock/KVM guest side, to be
> included
> against -tip.
>
What is the baseline for this patchset? I tried to apply it on top of
3.11-rc4 and I got nontrivial conflicts.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
