[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] VMX test report for Xen 4.4-unstable-C/S 27314
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:09 PM > To: Liu, SongtaoX; Ren, Yongjie > Cc: Zhou, Chao; Xu, Jiajun; Xu, YongweiX; Tian, Yongxue; xen-devel > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] VMX test report for Xen 4.4-unstable-C/S 27314 > > >>> On 12.08.13 at 05:43, "Liu, SongtaoX" <songtaox.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> On 08.08.13 at 09:13, "Ren, Yongjie" <yongjie.ren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > 2. device pass-through works even if VT-d is disabled in BIOS > >> > > >> > http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org//bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 > >> > 866 > >> > >> Are you sure this was seen with 27314:e6ca87e13937? I ask because > >> 27204:06c2f6031aff is supposed to be taking care of this (and it did > >> in my > > and - I > >> think - also in others' testing). To make things even less clear, the > >> bug > > itself > >> mentions 27203 and 27214... > >> > > Yes, it also exists in c/s 27204:06c2f6031aff, 27324:e9c802e5acc9. > > vt-d function had been disabled in BIOS, with "iommu=0" in grub line, > > "xl pci-assignable-add", "xl pci-attach" still works, and could > > passthrough to hvm guest, but the attached PCI device could not get > > IP. > > Please provide proof of that (logs + xl output) - I don't really trust this > given the > already mentioned confusion about changesets in the bug vs the report here. > > Jan I find this issue exist in IVT-EP but not exist in SNB-EP or HSW desktop. Here are the logs about this issue, include qemu log, "dmesg" and "xl dmesg" log of dom0, "dmesg" log of guest, as the attachment. Yongwei(Terrence) Attachment:
qemu.log Attachment:
dom_demsg.log Attachment:
dom0_xl_dmesg.log Attachment:
guest_dmesg.log _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |