[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Powerdown problem on XEN | ACPI S5
Hi Andrew, please see my inline comments further below. And many thanks to all of you for your support so far! Am 14.08.13 16:00, schrieb Andrew Cooper: The version I am using is 4.2.2 from the gentoo ebuild. Interesting enough, the log in the consoles statesOn 14/08/13 14:52, Atom2 wrote:Hi Jan, thanks for reply. You are obviously right that the first thing device_power_down does, is console_suspend(). I don't know why that escaped my eyes when I originally searched the file ... Anyways, I have now disabled console_suspend() and also added a few more lines to the code with printk statements indicating up to which point the system had gone (without errors). With hindsight I guess the new printk() statements might not have been required as now, with the console still active, a panic message pops up at the end, resulting in rebooting the system: (XEN) Disabling non-boot CPUs ... (XEN) Entering ACPI S5 state. (XEN) After local_irq_save (XEN) After spin_debug_disable (XEN) After time_suspend (XEN) After li8259_suspend (XEN) After ioapic_suspend (XEN) DMAR_IQA_REG = 80d87c002 (XEN) DMAR_IQH_REG = 120 (XEN) DMAR_IQT_REG = 140 (XEN) (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: (XEN) queue invalidate wait descriptor was not executed (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) (XEN) Reboot in five seconds... (XEN) Resetting with ACPI MEMORY or I/O RESET_REG. NOTE: All the messages starting with "(XEN) After" are from my changes to the code; the rest is as is - except me commenting out console_suspend() in power.c. I hope that helps in resolving the issue and the panic is not just the result of a knock-on effect from commenting out console_suspend() earlier.Huh - I thought I had fixed this issue already. Can you confirm exactly which version of Xen you are using (including changeset), and perhaps compile in this patch: (XEN) Latest ChangeSet: unavailableI don't know what to make out of this - or is there any other way to figure out, what you are after? The alternative would be to apply the WARN() to the 4.3.0 version I have downloaded yesterday from xenbits at http://www.xenproject.org/downloads/xen-archives/supported-xen-43-series/xen-430/287-xen-430-2/file.html (FYI: the reboot also happened there). If that helps, I'll rerun it on the 4.3.0 version. So far I have used the gentoo version as this allows me to stay within the portage system. diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c index 6a410d8..d023b26 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static int queue_invalidate_wait(struct iommu *iommu, if ( NOW() > (start_time + DMAR_OPERATION_TIMEOUT) ) { print_qi_regs(iommu); + WARN(); panic("queue invalidate wait descriptor was not executed\n"); } cpu_relax(); I have manually applied the patch - which was just an added WARN();inbetween if I read the patch correctly; the rest was already there in 4.2.2 (and also 4.3.0 - I checked its source as well). I have attached the serial log from my 4.2.2 run to prevent line-wrap. I hope that helps. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel Attachment:
XEN console log _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |