[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Solaris / FreeBSD builds (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] stdinc-related build fixes.)
At 14:25 +0100 on 15 Aug (1376576704), Tim Deegan wrote: > I rather suspect that FreeBSD and Solaris ought to be treated the same > way -- currently FreeBSD has no workarounds (but on a FreeBSD 5 box I > see stdarg.h in /usr/include) Yep, FreeBSD works with the same handling as the other BSDs. (I just sent a patch to do that.) > and Solaris just drops the nostdinc (I have no Solaris box handy to test on). Playing with a Solaris 10 VM (and gcc &c from opencsw) it looks like '-nostdinc -iwithprefix include' should work fine there, i.e.: diff --git a/xen/Rules.mk b/xen/Rules.mk index bbfc1ac..bf870da 100644 --- a/xen/Rules.mk +++ b/xen/Rules.mk @@ -45,10 +45,7 @@ CFLAGS-y += -fno-builtin -fno-common CFLAGS-y += -Werror -Wredundant-decls -Wno-pointer-arith CFLAGS-y += -pipe CFLAGS-y += -g -D__XEN__ -include $(BASEDIR)/include/xen/config.h -# Solaris puts stdarg.h &c in the system include directory. -ifneq ($(XEN_OS),SunOS) CFLAGS-y += -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -endif CFLAGS-$(XSM_ENABLE) += -DXSM_ENABLE CFLAGS-$(FLASK_ENABLE) += -DFLASK_ENABLE -DXSM_MAGIC=0xf97cff8c Sadly all I could find at short notice was 32-bit install media so I can't actually test the x86_64 build. Does anyone from Oracle want to try it? :) Cheers, Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |