[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Regression: x86/mm: new _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit conflicts with existing use
- To: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:44:18 +0400
- Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dhillf@xxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:45:08 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:51:15PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Could this explain what I'm seeing in another thread ?
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/7/27
Don't think so. This code is merged in -rc6, while your report is saying the
kernel version is -rc4 (also this feature requires CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
to be turned on, do you have it?).
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
