|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Xen/x86: Improve information from domain_crash_synchronous
>>> On 04.09.13 at 20:18, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As it currently stands, the string "domain_crash_sync called from entry.S" is
> not helpful at identifying why the domain was crashed, and a debug build of
> Xen doesn't help the matter
>
> This patch improves the information printed, by pointing to where the crash
> decision was made.
Looks quite useful.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/entry.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/entry.S
> @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ ENTRY(compat_int80_direct_trap)
> /* {[ERRCODE,] EIP, CS, EFLAGS, [ESP, SS]} */
> /* %rdx: trap_bounce, %rbx: struct vcpu */
> /* On return only %rbx and %rdx are guaranteed non-clobbered. */
> +.globl compat_create_bounce_frame
> compat_create_bounce_frame:
Is the addition above a left-over? I don't see any use of the
label outside of this file.
> @@ -329,7 +330,12 @@ UNLIKELY_END(compat_bounce_failsafe)
> movzwl TRAPBOUNCE_cs(%rdx),%eax
> /* Null selectors (0-3) are not allowed. */
> testl $~3,%eax
> - jz domain_crash_synchronous
> +.Lcompat_bounce_null_selector:
> +UNLIKELY_START(z, compat_bounce_null_selector)
> + lea .Lcompat_bounce_null_selector(%rip), %rdi
> + jmp asm_domain_crash_synchronous
> + ud2a
> +UNLIKELY_END(compat_bounce_null_selector)
Here and further down you don't really need the label at the
start of the unlikely section - the place can as well be identified
by using
lea (%rip), %rdi
inside that section (the place is still unique, just outside the
original code stream, i.e. just slightly more difficult to
re-associate).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |