|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V1 03/29] xen/dts: Don't check the number of address and size cells in process_cpu_node
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 15:47 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> CPU nodes are not required to have #address-cells == 1 and #size-cells == 0,
> so
> don't check for that (see Linux
> Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt
> Section III.5.a).
>
> In some OMAP5 device, tree, these 2 properties are not correctly set.
> Therefore,
> Xen will only able to handle 1 CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: baozich@xxxxxxxxx
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Update commit message
> ---
> xen/common/device_tree.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> index 3a3c99c..c4f0f2c 100644
> --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
> +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> @@ -414,12 +414,6 @@ static void __init process_cpu_node(const void *fdt, int
> node,
> const u32 *cell;
> paddr_t start, size;
>
> - if ( address_cells != 1 || size_cells != 0 )
> - {
> - early_printk("fdt: node `%s': invalid #address-cells or #size-cells",
> - name);
> - return;
> - }
>
> prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "reg", NULL);
> if ( !prop )
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |