|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next 1/2] xen-netback: add a vif-is-connected flag
On 20/09/13 14:31, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:56:30PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> Having applied my patch to separate vif disconnect and free, I ran into a
>> BUG when testing resume from S3 with a Windows frontend because the vif task
>> pointer was not cleared by xenvif_disconnect() and so a double call to this
>> function tries to stop the thread twice.
>> Rather than applying a point fix for that issue it seems better to introduce
>> a boolean to indicate whether the vif is connected or not such that repeated
>> calls to either xenvif_connect() or xenvif_disconnect() behave appropriately.
We already have a backend state of CONNECTED/CLOSED/etc. why do we need
an additional bit of state outside of this?
Does something like this in frontend_changed() fix it?
case XenbusStateClosing:
switch (dev->state) {
case XenbusStateClosed;
break;
case XenbusStateConnected:
disconnect_backend(dev);
/* fall through */
default:
xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosing);
break;
}
break;
case XenbusStateClosed:
switch (dev->state) {
case XenbusStateConnected;
disconnect_backend(dev);
/* fall through */
default:
xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed);
break;
}
if (xenbus_dev_is_online(dev))
break;
/* fall through if not online */
Can you also remove destroy_backend()? It's not needed any more.
I'd also recommend waiting a bit for other review feedback before
posting an updated series.
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |