Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/16] xen/events: refactor retrigger_dynirq() and resend_irq_on_evtchn()

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/08/2013 08:49 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> These two function did the same thing with different parameters, put
> the common bits in retrigger_evtchn().
>
> This changes the return value of resend_irq_on_evtchn() but the only
> caller (in arch/ia64/xen/irq_xen.c) ignored the return value so this
> is fine.
Not directly related to this patch, but why do we still have 
arch/ia64/xen? Is anyone testing it? I only see a few superficial 
changes in the log for last year, and those appear to be result of code 
inspection or some global changes, not actual execution.
-boris


> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/xen/events.c |   27 +++++++++------------------
>   1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> index 4035e83..ddcdbb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> @@ -1558,13 +1558,13 @@ static int set_affinity_irq(struct irq_data *data, 
> const struct cpumask *dest,
>         return rebind_irq_to_cpu(data->irq, tcpu);
>   }
>   
> -int resend_irq_on_evtchn(unsigned int irq)
> +static int retrigger_evtchn(int evtchn)
>   {
> -       int masked, evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(irq);
> +       int masked;
>         struct shared_info *s = HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
>   
>   	if (!VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn))
> -               return 1;
> +               return 0;
>   
>   	masked = sync_test_and_set_bit(evtchn, BM(s->evtchn_mask));
>         sync_set_bit(evtchn, BM(s->evtchn_pending));
> @@ -1574,6 +1574,11 @@ int resend_irq_on_evtchn(unsigned int irq)
>         return 1;
>   }
>   
> +int resend_irq_on_evtchn(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +       return retrigger_evtchn(evtchn_from_irq(irq));
> +}
> +
>   static void enable_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
>   {
>         int evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(data->irq);
> @@ -1608,21 +1613,7 @@ static void mask_ack_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
>   
>   static int retrigger_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
>   {
> -       int evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(data->irq);
> -       struct shared_info *sh = HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> -       int ret = 0;
> -
> -       if (VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn)) {
> -               int masked;
> -
> -               masked = sync_test_and_set_bit(evtchn, BM(sh->evtchn_mask));
> -               sync_set_bit(evtchn, BM(sh->evtchn_pending));
> -               if (!masked)
> -                       unmask_evtchn(evtchn);
> -               ret = 1;
> -       }
> -
> -       return ret;
> +       return retrigger_evtchn(evtchn_from_irq(data->irq));
>   }
>   
>   static void restore_pirqs(void)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel