Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.10 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/11/13 12:16, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 12:12 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 12:07 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> 
>>> The 3.10 stable tree is missing dc62ccaccfb139d9b04bbc5a2688a4402adbfab3
>>> (xen-netback: transition to CLOSED when removing a VIF) which fixes a
>>> regression introduced in the above patch.
>>>
>>> This depends on ea732dff5cfa10789007bf4a5b935388a0bb2a8f (xen-netback:
>>> Handle backend state transitions in a more robust way) which fixes an
>>> issue with some old Windows frontends.
>>>
>>> Both of these should be backported to stable.
>>
>> Yes, this was also discussed yesterday in reply to one of the failures.
>> Has someone pinged DaveM already?
> 
> Nevermind, I just did it...

As did I...

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel