Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Compliance with new coding style

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 05:11:09AM -0800, Kelley Nielsen wrote:
> Yes, Ian suggested that I put it in the subject prefix. I just wanted to
> give you a heads up that it was coming from someone who might not know what
> they're doing :-)

You can use git-format-patch --subject-prefix "OPW PATCH" and that would
nicely make the '[OPW PATCH] libxl'.. and when one uses git-am it strips
out the '[*]' part.

> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:54 AM, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> 
> > On 11/11/13 07:08, Kelley Nielsen wrote:
> > > This patchset brings the file libxl_utils.c mostly into compliance
> > > with the new coding style involving the convenience macros LOG,
> > > LOGE, and GCSPRINTF.
> > >
> > > [PATCH 1/4] opw: libxl: use GCSPRINTF instead of libxl__sprintf
> > > [PATCH 2/4] opw: libxl: use LOGE instead of LIBXL__LOG_ERRNO in
> > > [PATCH 3/4] opw: libxl: use LOG and LOGE instead of LIBXL__LOG* in
> > > [PATCH 4/4] opw: libxl: use LOG instead of LIBXL__LOG in
> >
> > I think you should drop the "opw:" prefix from the subject.
> >
> > David
> >

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel