[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2-resend 22/30] libxl: ocaml: event management [and 1 more messages]
Rob Hoes writes ("[PATCH v4 18/27] libxl: ocaml: event management"): > Signed-off-by: Rob Hoes <rob.hoes@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: David Scott <dave.scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/ocaml/libs/xl/xenlight.ml.in | 66 +++++++ > tools/ocaml/libs/xl/xenlight.mli.in | 47 +++++ > tools/ocaml/libs/xl/xenlight_stubs.c | 325 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I replied to v2 of this as follows: Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2-resend 22/30] libxl: ocaml: event management"): > Can you explain in a bit more detail how you expect to use this ? > > I'm very surprised that apparently the right interface to provide is > one which exposes the poll-based event loop machinery to ocaml. > Surely it would be better to plumb that in at a lower level. But I haven't had an answer. I think that whether this is the right approach depends on how event loops are traditionally done in ocaml. I'm afraid, though, that in the absence of an explanation: Nacked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Ian. PS Does anyone here know how Mirage handles event loops ? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |