Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 5 V3] tools/libxl: Control network buffering in remus callbacks [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Shriram Rajagopalan writes ("Re: [PATCH 4 of 5 V3] tools/libxl: Control network 
buffering in remus callbacks [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]"):
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
...
> The patch seems harmless enough. How do you want to go about this?

If you think this is the right approach, you should start on it right
away based on my patch.  The reason I posted it quickly was because I
wanted to unblock you.

> Do you want to post/commit this patch ? Because I have to modify my
> patches accordingly. Or should I post this along with my patch
> series, avoiding the need to wait on you before I post mine ?

You can certainly take it into the start of your patch series, yes.
Like what Roger did with the nested ao patch.

Currently there isn't any other reason to make the change in this
patch, so I don't think it should be committed right away.  But if for
some reason it does get committed to staging, you or we can just drop
it from the start of your series.

Regards,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel