Re: [Xen-devel] Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [xen-unstable test] 21486: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED))

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 12 November 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 November 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 14:35 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > On 11/12/2013 01:37 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > BTW, does Dom0 require an LPAE-enabled kernel or can it be a regular
> > > > > non-LPAE ARMv6/v7 multiplatform build?
> > > > 
> > > > It can be both.
> > > 
> > > NB: v7 only, we don't do v6 at all. But yes either LPAE or regular is
> > > fine with us.
> > 
> > Why not combined v6/v7 kernels for non-LPAE? I can't see a technical reason
> > preventing you from running a Dom0 or DomU kernel that can also run on
> > some ARMv6 platform as long as both platforms and CPUs are enabled in
> > Kconfig.
> 
> Unfortunately today we can't support ARMv6.
> From f880b67dcbdedb49453f88d2ccb1a0937b046d82:
>    
>     * ARMv6 does not support cmpxchg on 16-bit words that are used in the
>       Xen grant table code, so we must ensure that Xen support is only
>       built on ARMv7-only kernels not combined ARMv6/v7 kernels.

Ah, I must have made a mistake there. It's not strictly a bug, but I think
it would be better to undo the dependency I added in that patch and instead
change the Makefile to build the grant table code with -march=armv7-a:
This is safe because we know that this code will only /run/ on v7 even
in a combined v6/v7 kernel, but it lets us get better build coverage because
then we will enable Xen support in an allmodconfig or allyesconfig kernel
that today enables both v6 and v7.

        Arnd

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel