[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/16] xenctx: clean up usage output
On 11/11/13 13:15, Don Slutz wrote: From: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Fix usage formatting to be all the same. Fix usage display of default --kernel-start for 64 bit. Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/xentrace/xenctx.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c b/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c index 060e480..4490d82 100644 --- a/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c +++ b/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c @@ -812,15 +812,16 @@ static void usage(void)printf("options:\n");printf(" -f, --frame-pointers\n"); - printf(" assume the kernel was compiled with\n"); - printf(" frame pointers.\n"); + printf(" assume the kernel was compiled with\n"); + printf(" frame pointers.\n"); printf(" -s SYMTAB, --symbol-table=SYMTAB\n"); - printf(" read symbol table from SYMTAB.\n"); - printf(" -S --stack-trace print a complete stack trace.\n"); - printf(" -k, --kernel-start\n"); - printf(" set user/kernel split. (default 0xc0000000)\n"); - printf(" -a --all display more registers\n"); - printf(" -C --all-vcpus print info for all vcpus\n"); + printf(" read symbol table from SYMTAB.\n"); + printf(" -S, --stack-trace print a complete stack trace.\n"); + printf(" -k kaddr, --kernel-start=kaddr\n"); When redoing patch #4 I noticed that kaddr was not added as KADDR. Also I started using <maddr> not MADDR. Which is the preferred way? -Don Slutz + printf(" set user/kernel split. (default 0x"FMT_32B_WORD")\n", + kernel_start); + printf(" -a, --all display more registers\n"); + printf(" -C, --all-vcpus print info for all vcpus\n"); }int main(int argc, char **argv) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |