Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/7] xen: vNUMA support for guests.

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/14/2013 10:51 PM, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, George Dunlap
> <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 11/14/2013 03:26 AM, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> > > Defines interface, structures and hypercalls for guests that wish
> > > to retreive vNUMA topology from Xen.
> > > Two subop hypercalls introduced by patch:
> > > XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo to define vNUMA domain topology per domain
> > > and XENMEM_get_vnuma_info to retreive that topology by guest.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks, Elena -- this looks like it's much closer to being ready to be
> > checked in.  A few comments:
> Hi George, good to hear )
> > > @@ -871,6 +872,87 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
> > > u_domctl)
> > >        }
> > >        break;
> > >
> > > +    case XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo:
> > > +    {
> > > +        unsigned int i = 0, dist_size;
> > > +        uint nr_vnodes;
> > > +        ret = -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +        /* Already set? */
> > > +        if ( d->vnuma.nr_vnodes > 0 )
> > > +            return 0;
> > > +
> > > +        nr_vnodes = op->u.vnuma.nr_vnodes;
> > > +
> > > +        if ( nr_vnodes == 0 )
> > > +            return ret;
> > > +        if ( nr_vnodes * nr_vnodes > UINT_MAX )
> > > +            return ret;
> > > +
> > > +        /*
> > > +         * If null, vnode_numamap will set default to
> > > +         * point to allocation mechanism to dont use
> > > +         * per physical node allocation or this is for
> > > +         * cases when there is no physical NUMA.
> > > +         */
> > > +        if ( guest_handle_is_null(op->u.vnuma.vdistance) ||
> > > +             guest_handle_is_null(op->u.vnuma.vmemrange) ||
> > > +             guest_handle_is_null(op->u.vnuma.vcpu_to_vnode) )
> > > +            goto err_dom;
> > > +
> > > +        dist_size = nr_vnodes * nr_vnodes;
> > > +
> > > +        d->vnuma.vdistance = xmalloc_array(unsigned int, dist_size);
> > > +        d->vnuma.vmemrange = xmalloc_array(vmemrange_t, nr_vnodes);
> > > +        d->vnuma.vcpu_to_vnode = xmalloc_array(unsigned int,
> > > d->max_vcpus);
> > > +        d->vnuma.vnode_numamap = xmalloc_array(unsigned int, nr_vnodes);
> >
> > Is there a risk here that you'll leak memory if a buggy toolstack calls
> > setvnuma_info multiple times?
> In order to run through xmalloc again,  d->vnuma.nr_vnodes should be
> equal to zero.
> The only way to set it to zero (for domain) is to exit from this call
> with error (wich sets it to zero and releases memory) or to call
> vnuma_destroy for domain. Zero as a new value for nr_vnodes is not
> accepted so it cant be set by issuing do_domctl.
Oh, right -- sorry, I missed that.  In that case, can I suggest changing 
that comment to, "Don't initialize again if we've already been 
initialized once" or something like that.  You should probably add 
"ASSERT(d->vnuma.$FOO==NULL);" as well, as a precaution (and as a hint 
to people who are reading the code too quickly).
Also, that should return an error (-EBUSY? -EINVAL?), rather than 
returning success.
> > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> > > index d4e479f..da458d3 100644
> > > --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> > > +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> > >    #include "xen.h"
> > >    #include "grant_table.h"
> > >    #include "hvm/save.h"
> > > +#include "vnuma.h"
> > >
> > >    #define XEN_DOMCTL_INTERFACE_VERSION 0x00000009
> > >
> > > @@ -863,6 +864,27 @@ struct xen_domctl_set_max_evtchn {
> > >    typedef struct xen_domctl_set_max_evtchn xen_domctl_set_max_evtchn_t;
> > >    DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_domctl_set_max_evtchn_t);
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo: sets the vNUMA topology
> > > + * parameters a guest may request.
> > > + */
> > > +struct xen_domctl_vnuma {
> > > +    uint32_t nr_vnodes;
> > > +    uint32_t __pad;
> > > +    XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64(uint) vdistance;
> > > +    XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64(uint) vcpu_to_vnode;
> > > +    /* domain memory mapping map to physical NUMA nodes */
> > > +    XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64(uint) vnode_numamap;
> >
> > What is this for?  We don't pass this to the guest or seem to use it in any
> > way.
> This is used to set domain vnode to pnode mapping, do allocations
> later and keep it on per-domain
> basis for later use. For example, as vnuma aware ballooning will
> request this information.
Oh, right -- we wanted the HV to be able to translate the vnuma 
ballooning requests from vnode to pnode without the guest knowing about 
it.  Sorry, forgot about that.
It's probably worth noting that, at least in the changelog, and probably 
in a comment somewhere.
 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel