[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86: Fix vcpu xsave bug
>>> On 15.11.13 at 19:52, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Please don't to-post. > No, what I meant is, nonlazy xstates should be xsaved each time > vcpu_save_fpu. > Operation to nonlazy xstates will not trigger #NM exception, so whenever > vcpu scheduled in it should get restored and whenever vcpu scheduled out it > should get saved. So you're saying that AMD's LWP would be broken in that respect currently too. Hence in any event this needs to be coordinated with AMD, and the description needs improving. > As for the comments I just want to unify it with other 'clts' comments. But you're making an admittedly non-optimal comment completely wrong - there's no recursion involved in triggering #NM there. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |