|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2] pvh: clearly specify used parameters in vcpu_guest_context
On 19/11/13 11:34, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/18/2013 06:18 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> The aim of this patch is to define a stable way in which PVH is
>> going to do AP bringup.
>>
>> Since we are running inside of a HVM container, PVH should only need
>> to set flags, cr3 and user_regs in order to bring up a vCPU, the rest
>> can be set once the vCPU is started using the bare metal methods.
>> Additionally, the guest can also set cr0 and cr4, and those values
>> will be appended to the default values set by Xen.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +-----
>> xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h | 6 +++---
>> xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen.h | 8 ++++----
>> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> index a3868f9..51311fc 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>> #include <asm/fixmap.h>
>> #include <asm/hvm/hvm.h>
>> #include <asm/hvm/support.h>
>> +#include <asm/hvm/nestedhvm.h>
>> #include <asm/debugreg.h>
>> #include <asm/msr.h>
>> #include <asm/traps.h>
>> @@ -704,9 +705,13 @@ int arch_set_info_guest(
>> /* PVH 32bitfixme */
>> ASSERT(!compat);
>>
>> - if ( c(ctrlreg[1]) || c(ldt_base) || c(ldt_ents) ||
>> + if ( (c(ctrlreg[0]) & HVM_CR0_GUEST_RESERVED_BITS) ||
>> + (c(ctrlreg[4]) & HVM_CR4_GUEST_RESERVED_BITS(v)) ||
>
> Good idea. :-)
>
>> + c(ctrlreg[1]) || c(ctrlreg[2]) || c(ctrlreg[5]) ||
>> + c(ctrlreg[6]) || c(ctrlreg[7]) || c(ldt_base) ||
>> c(ldt_ents) ||
>> c(user_regs.cs) || c(user_regs.ss) || c(user_regs.es) ||
>> c(user_regs.ds) || c(user_regs.fs) || c(user_regs.gs) ||
>> + c(kernel_ss) || c(kernel_sp) || c.nat->gs_base_kernel ||
>> c.nat->gdt_ents || c.nat->fs_base || c.nat->gs_base_user )
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -745,17 +750,20 @@ int arch_set_info_guest(
>>
>> if ( has_hvm_container_vcpu(v) )
>> {
>> - /*
>> - * NB: TF_kernel_mode is set unconditionally for HVM guests,
>> - * so we always use the gs_base_kernel here. If we change this
>> - * function to imitate the PV functionality, we'll need to
>> - * make it pay attention to the kernel bit.
>> - */
>> - hvm_set_info_guest(v, compat ? 0 : c.nat->gs_base_kernel);
>
> I think we still need to call hvm_set_info_guest() here -- there is
> other stuff being set up, and it was called (without the extra argument
> for gs_base_kernel) before the PVH patch series went in.
>
> (See c/s 35b1e07.)
I see, I will restore the hvm_set_info_guest call, good catch.
>
>>
>> if ( is_hvm_vcpu(v) || v->is_initialised )
>> goto out;
>>
>> + if ( c.nat->ctrlreg[0] ) {
>> + v->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_cr[0] |= c.nat->ctrlreg[0];
>> + hvm_update_guest_cr(v, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ( c.nat->ctrlreg[4] ) {
>> + v->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_cr[4] |= c.nat->ctrlreg[4];
>> + hvm_update_guest_cr(v, 4);
>> + }
>
> I thought the idea was that he would set cr0, cr3, and cr4 for all HVM
> guests, rather than special-casing PVH guests?
Well, I was just trying to make the PVH AP bringup interface stable,
without messing much with HVM (not that we shouldn't aim to do it for
HVM guests also), but I think the main concern now is releasing 4.4 with
a stable interface for PVH guests.
Thanks, Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |