[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Test if on newer xen all SSE2 and SSE3 instructions are effectively working
>>> On 22.11.13 at 13:14, Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Il 21/11/2013 16:38, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: >> On 21/11/13 15:32, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 21/11/13 15:22, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>> On 21/11/13 15:12, George Dunlap wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Fabio Fantoni >>>>> <fabio.fantoni@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> I'm trying to test if on newer xen all SSE2 and SSE3 instructions are >>>>>> effectively working. >>>>>> I tried this simple program to test SSE2: >>>>>> http://forum.nasm.us/index.php?topic=1605.0 >>>>>> But probably use only instructions with short operand because SSE2 >>>>>> on this >>>>>> program is working also on old xen 4.0 where Jan Beulich patches to >>>>>> support >>>>>> long operands are missing. >>>>>> Are there any minimal program to test if SSE instructions with MMIO >>>>>> operands >>>>>>> 8 byte are working? >>>>> I don't see the code there doing MMIO -- it's just doing operations on >>>>> normal RAM, which is not emulated by Xen at all, but executed natively >>>>> by the processor. >>>>> >>>>> What you need is a program that will do this to an MMIO region -- that >>>>> will be a much trickier thing to set up, I think. >>>>> >>>>> -George >>>> The problem with SSE is only when the guest performs an SSE (or larger) >>>> operation on a piece of memory which ends up being emulated and handed >>>> to qemu. The ioreq protocol doesn't have a way of signalling an operand >>>> width greater than 64 bits. >>> I'd like to emphasize the "and" in the first sentence. You might be >>> able to trigger a Xen emulation in any number of ways (disabling HAP >>> and then doing an SSE instruction on an in-use PT might do it). But >>> Xen allegedly already does the actual emulation correctly -- as Andy >>> said, it's only the path to qemu that wasn't working before. >>> >>> -George >>> >> Oops yes - I should have emphasised that a bit more. I believe Jan >> submitted a hacked-fix for the qemu path which fixes the immediate issue >> (for 128bit emulation) but is in need of a redesign for wider emulation; >> 256bit is available with AVX, and 512bit is on its way with AVX2. >> >> As for testing individual instructions, there is >> tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c which tests a token few >> instructions against Xen's emulation code, but it is far from comprehensive. >> >> ~Andrew > > Thanks for all replies. > I tried x86_emulator on dom0 and SSE2 instructions seems ok: Sure. Which means you still didn't understand that you need to try with SSE instructions accessing MMIO where the emulation happens in qemu. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |