Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 22066: regressions - FAIL

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thursday, November 21, 2013, 6:44:35 PM, you wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 18:36 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Thursday, November 21, 2013, 5:37:57 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>> > flight 22066 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
>> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/
>> 
>> > Regressions :-(
>> 
>> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> > including tests which could not be run:
>> >  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install    fail REGR. vs. 
>> > 20054
>> 
>> Wasn't this supposed to be fixed by Anthony Perards fix for Xen ?

> Yes, but that needs to pass regression testing on the xen-unstable
> branch before the qemu branch will be tested against it. xen-unstable is
> currently not going through for unrelated reasons but I expect it will
> unwedge tonight.

> Ian.

Hi Ian,

Just wondering .. is the tree and  that's being tested here published somewhere 
?
A commit of mine is in there but i don't seem to find it in:




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel