Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 22066: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 00:50 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Thursday, November 21, 2013, 6:44:35 PM, you wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 18:36 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >> Thursday, November 21, 2013, 5:37:57 PM, you wrote:
> >> 
> >> > flight 22066 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
> >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/
> >> 
> >> > Regressions :-(
> >> 
> >> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >> > including tests which could not be run:
> >> >  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install    fail REGR. 
> >> > vs. 20054
> >> 
> >> Wasn't this supposed to be fixed by Anthony Perards fix for Xen ?
> 
> > Yes, but that needs to pass regression testing on the xen-unstable
> > branch before the qemu branch will be tested against it. xen-unstable is
> > currently not going through for unrelated reasons but I expect it will
> > unwedge tonight.
> 
> > Ian.
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Ian / Stefano,
> 
> Is the tree and branch being tested here published somewhere ?

All of the details are in each test pass/failure report. Follow the URL
and click on one of the column headers.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/
=>
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/build-amd64/info.html
=> 
             tree_qemuu
git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git

> A commit of mine is in there, but i can't find it where i would expected in:

Where is "there"?

> 
> git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
> 
> (and also not in: git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
> nor git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git)
> 
> 
> But it is mentioned in the "People who touched revisions under test" ...

The 1.6 merge was big -- are you sure you looked far enough back?

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel