[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/6] X86: MPX IA32_BNDCFGS msr dump
>>> On 28.11.13 at 07:37, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From 00d1af4ee854b033a3cffa5abd1031a3c2da3b03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:03:24 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH 5/6] X86: MPX IA32_BNDCFGS msr dump > > Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/misc/xen-hvmctx.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/misc/xen-hvmctx.c b/tools/misc/xen-hvmctx.c > index 5a69245..b3e4b2b 100644 > --- a/tools/misc/xen-hvmctx.c > +++ b/tools/misc/xen-hvmctx.c > @@ -399,6 +399,13 @@ static void dump_tsc_adjust(void) > printf(" TSC_ADJUST: tsc_adjust %" PRIx64 "\n", p.tsc_adjust); > } > > +static void dump_msr_bndcfgs(void) > +{ > + HVM_SAVE_TYPE(MSR_BNDCFGS) p; > + READ(p); > + printf(" MSR_BNDCFGS: %" PRIx64 "\n", p.msr_bndcfgs); > +} > + > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > int entry, domid; > @@ -467,6 +474,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > case HVM_SAVE_CODE(VIRIDIAN_VCPU): dump_viridian_vcpu(); break; > case HVM_SAVE_CODE(VMCE_VCPU): dump_vmce_vcpu(); break; > case HVM_SAVE_CODE(TSC_ADJUST): dump_tsc_adjust(); break; > + case HVM_SAVE_CODE(MSR_BNDCFGS): dump_msr_bndcfgs(); break; > case HVM_SAVE_CODE(END): break; > default: > printf(" ** Don't understand type %u: skipping\n", Any reason why this can't (and really shouldn't) be part of the previous patch? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |