Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/13] Valgrind patches for hypercalls

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 10:55 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Sadly, its the daemonisation aspect which is the interesting one to look
> at.  Memory leaks in the daemon are far more critical than in the
> short-lived runs.

I think the issue was just that you get confusing output from multiple
processes after the fork etc, nothing inherently "buggy" as such, at
least not WRT the handling of the hypercalls.

Note that you can still debug the monitoring aspect without daemonising
it, by running the monitor in the foreground.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel