|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen/arm: Physical IRQ is not always equal to virtual IRQ
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
When Xen needs to EOI a physical IRQ, we should use the IRQ number
in irq_desc instead of the virtual IRQ.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index 43c11cb..7e87acb 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static void gic_irq_eoi(void *info)
static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs
*regs)
{
- int i = 0, virq;
+ int i = 0, virq, pirq;
uint32_t lr;
struct vcpu *v = current;
uint64_t eisr = GICH[GICH_EISR0] | (((uint64_t) GICH[GICH_EISR1]) << 32);
@@ -916,6 +916,7 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id,
struct cpu_user_regs *r
/* Assume only one pcpu needs to EOI the irq */
cpu = p->desc->arch.eoi_cpu;
eoi = 1;
+ pirq = p->desc->irq;
}
list_del_init(&p->inflight);
spin_unlock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock);
@@ -924,10 +925,10 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id,
struct cpu_user_regs *r
/* this is not racy because we can't receive another irq of the
* same type until we EOI it. */
if ( cpu == smp_processor_id() )
- gic_irq_eoi((void*)(uintptr_t)virq);
+ gic_irq_eoi((void*)(uintptr_t)pirq);
else
on_selected_cpus(cpumask_of(cpu),
- gic_irq_eoi, (void*)(uintptr_t)virq, 0);
+ gic_irq_eoi, (void*)(uintptr_t)pirq, 0);
}
i++;
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |