|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/4] hvm_save_one: return correct data.
On 12/13/13 09:20, Jan Beulich wrote: On 12.12.13 at 01:56, Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> It is possible that hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].save does not use
>> all the provided room. In that case, using:
>>
>> instance * hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size
>>
>> does not select the correct instance. Add code to search for the
>> correct instance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>
> But this needs to be cleaned up coding style wise and ...
>
>> --- a/xen/common/hvm/save.c +++ b/xen/common/hvm/save.c @@ -112,13
>> +112,27 @@ int hvm_save_one(struct domain *d, uint16_t typecode,
>> uint16_t instance, d->domain_id, typecode); rv = -EFAULT; } -
>> else if ( copy_to_guest(handle, -
>> ctxt.data - + (instance *
>> hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size) - +
>> sizeof (struct hvm_save_descriptor), -
>> hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size - -
>> sizeof (struct hvm_save_descriptor)) ) - rv = -EFAULT; +
>> else + { + uint32_t off; + + rv = -EBADSLT; +
>> for (off = 0; off < ctxt.cur; off +=
>> hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size) { + struct
>> hvm_save_descriptor *desc + = (struct
>> hvm_save_descriptor *)&ctxt.data[off];
>
> .. this could be const, and the cast could simply be (void *), ...
>
>> + if (instance == desc->instance) { + rv
>> = 0; + if ( copy_to_guest(handle, +
>> ctxt.data + + off
>
> ... this doesn't need to be on a separate line, and ...
>
>> + + sizeof (struct
>> hvm_save_descriptor), +
>> hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size +
>> - sizeof (struct hvm_save_descriptor)) )
>
> ... both these sizeof()s would now better be sizeof(*desc).
>
> Jan
>
I think I have corrected all coding errors (please check again). And
done all requested changes. I did add the reviewed by (not sure if I
should since this changes a large part of the patch, but they are all
what Jan said).
I have unit tested it and it appears to work the same as the previous version (as expected). Here is the new version, also attached. From e0e8f5246ba492b153884cea93bfe753f1b0782e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:22:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] hvm_save_one: return correct data. It is possible that hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].save does not use all the provided room. In that case, using: instance * hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size does not select the correct instance. Add code to search for the correct instance. Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- xen/common/hvm/save.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/hvm/save.c b/xen/common/hvm/save.c index de76ada..6aaea6f 100644 --- a/xen/common/hvm/save.c +++ b/xen/common/hvm/save.c@@ -112,13 +112,27 @@ int hvm_save_one(struct domain *d, uint16_t typecode, uint16_t instance,
d->domain_id, typecode);
rv = -EFAULT;
}
- else if ( copy_to_guest(handle,
- ctxt.data
- + (instance * hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size)
- + sizeof (struct hvm_save_descriptor),
- hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size
- - sizeof (struct hvm_save_descriptor)) )
- rv = -EFAULT;
+ else
+ {
+ uint32_t off;
+
+ rv = -EBADSLT;
+ for ( off = 0; off < ctxt.cur; off +=
hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size )
+ {
+ const struct hvm_save_descriptor *desc = (void
*)&ctxt.data[off];
+
+ if ( instance == desc->instance )
+ {
+ rv = 0;
+ if ( copy_to_guest(handle,
+ ctxt.data + off + sizeof(*desc),
+ hvm_sr_handlers[typecode].size
+ - sizeof(*desc)) )
+ rv = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
xfree(ctxt.data);
return rv;
--
1.7.11.7
-Don Slutz
Attachment:
0003-hvm_save_one-return-correct-data.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |