[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Multi-bridged PCIe devices (Was: Re: iommuu/vt-d issues with LSI MegaSAS (PERC5i))



Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on 2014-01-07:
>> Which would look like this:
>> 
>> C220 ---> Tundra Bridge -----> (HB6 PCI bridge -> Brooktree BDFs) on the card
>>            \--------------> IEEE-1394a
>> 
>> I am actually wondering if this 07:00.0 device is the one that
>> reports itself as 08:00.0 (which I think is what you alluding to
>> Jan)
>> 
> 
> And to double check that theory I decided to pass in the IEEE-1394a to a 
> guest:
> 
>            +-1c.5-[07-08]----00.0-[08]----03.0  Texas Instruments
> TSB43AB22A IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) [iOHCI-Lynx]
> 
> 
> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:885: iommu_fault_status: Fault Overflow (XEN)
> [VT-D]iommu.c:887: iommu_fault_status: Primary Pending Fault (XEN)
> [VT-D]iommu.c:865: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [0000:08:00.0] fault
> addr 370f1000, iommu reg = ffff82c3ffd53000 (XEN) DMAR:[fault reason
> 02h] Present bit in context entry is clear (XEN) print_vtd_entries:
> iommu ffff83083d4939b0 dev 0000:08:00.0 gmfn 370f1 (XEN)     root_entry
> = ffff83083d47f000 (XEN)     root_entry[8] = 72569b001 (XEN)     context
> = ffff83072569b000 (XEN)     context[0] = 0_0 (XEN)     ctxt_entry[0]
> not present
> 
> So, capture card OK - Likely the Tundra bridge has an issue:
> 
> 07:00.0 PCI bridge: Tundra Semiconductor Corp. Device 8113 (rev 01)
> (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode])
>         Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
>         ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz-
>         UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+
>         >SERR- <PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Bus: primary=07, secondary=08,
>         subordinate=08, sec-latency=32 Memory behind bridge:
>         f0600000-f06fffff Secondary status: 66MHz+ FastB2B+ ParErr-
>         DEVSEL=medium TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ <SERR- <PERR- BridgeCtl:
>         Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
>                 PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
>         Capabilities: [60] Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Device 0805
>         Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 3
>                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
>                 PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 NoSoftRst+
>                 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> 
> or there is some unknown bridge in the motherboard.

According your description above, the upstream Linux should also have the same 
problem. Did you see it with upstream Linux?
There may be some buggy device that generate DMA request with internal BDF but 
it didn't expose it(not like Phantom device). For those devices, I think we 
need to setup the VT-d page table manually.

Best regards,
Yang



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.