[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 16/33] xen, irq: Call irq_alloc_reserved_desc_at() at first
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Stefano Stabellini > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> drivers/xen/events.c | 8 ++++++-- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c > >> index 4035e83..020cd77 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c > >> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c > >> @@ -508,8 +508,12 @@ static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_gsi(unsigned > >> gsi) > >> /* Legacy IRQ descriptors are already allocated by the arch. */ > >> if (gsi < NR_IRQS_LEGACY) > >> irq = gsi; > >> - else > >> - irq = irq_alloc_desc_at(gsi, -1); > >> + else { > >> + /* for x86, irq already get reserved for gsi */ > >> + irq = irq_alloc_reserved_desc_at(gsi, -1); > >> + if (irq < 0) > >> + irq = irq_alloc_desc_at(gsi, -1); > >> + } > > > > This is common code. On ARM I get: > > > > drivers/xen/events.c: In function 'xen_allocate_irq_gsi': > > drivers/xen/events.c:513:3: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'irq_alloc_reserved_desc_at' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > irq = irq_alloc_reserved_desc_at(gsi, -1); > > ^ > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > It's strange. > > that is defined with irq_alloc_desc_at in parallel in > include/linux/irq.h and kernel/irq/irqdesc.c. > > Did you try the whole tree, or just this patch? Just this patch. The whole tree (yinghai/for-x86-irq-3.14) builds just fine. Thanks! - Stefano _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |