[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] xend vs xl with pci=['<bdf'] wherein the '<bdf>' are not owned by pciback or pcistub will still launch.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:22:58AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > create ^ > thanks > > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 12:57 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > In Xend, if I had a pci entry in the guest config and the > > PCI device was not assigned to xen-pciback or pci-stub it > > would refuse to launch the guest. > > > > Not so with 'xl'. It will complain but still launch: > > It looks like domcreate_attach_pci() is ignoring the result of > libxl__device_pci_add(). It appears to have always done so. > > I suppose there is an argument that there are usecases where starting > the domain at all even without the full set of devices is better than > not starting it at all, but I think I agree that the default should be > to fail if some devices are not available. <nods> The guest wasn't too happy about some of them missing :-) > > Is this a blocker for you for 4.4 or can it wait for 4.5? Not a blocker. It can wait, just want to make sure we don't forget. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |