On 09.01.14 at 17:08, Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Based on Mukesh's statement, attached is the rebased version of this patch
(labeled v3). I included Mukesh's ack.
Unless this is meant just for reviewing purposes (albeit even then
it's likely problematic), could you please get used to sending
patch revisions with mail subjects (i.e. not retaining the prior
version indicator), so there is a reasonable chance to reconstruct
things by searching just the titles in a mail archive. (It's still fine -
at least as far as I'm concerned - to reply to an earlier version,
thus tying things into a single thread on the archive.)
Jan
