[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] translate pirq to irq
Hi Andrew, On Jan 12, 2014, at 10:29 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 11/01/2014 22:59, Igor Kozhukhov wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I see a comment in physdev.h for 'struct physdev_map_pirq', var 'pirq': >> /* IN - high 16 bits hold segment for MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI_SEG */ >> >> i have received 'pirq' from hypervisor > 255. >> >> map_irq.domid = DOMID_SELF; >> >> map_irq.type = MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI; >> >> map_irq.index = -1; /* hypervisor auto allocates vector */ >> >> map_irq.pirq = -1; >> >> map_irq.bus = busnum; >> >> map_irq.devfn = devfn; >> >> map_irq.entry_nr = i; >> >> map_irq.table_base = 0; >> rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq, &map_irq); >> >> irqno = map_irq.pirq; >> >> i have: >> irqno = 279 - it is more APIC_MAX_VECTOR(255) >> >> i have a question: how to correct translate pirq to irq for APIC map table ? >> >> all work well on xen-3.4, but it has another realization in function >> physdev_map_pirq() then for xen-4.2. > > Is this for a PV or HVM guest? I suspect PV, in which case the irqno > handed back will be the event channel on which the notification will > arrive, and has nothing to do with regular IDT vectors. it is for dom0. full boot log with xen debug info and DDI_DEBUG on illumos you can find here : http://apt2.dilos.org/dilos/logs/putty.log.dom0.txt if it is possible - could you please let me know how to work MSI irq translation to APIC irq table for xen-4.2 ? i see - in xen code we have a range from 16 to 784 for 4 CPU for MSI IRQ (irq_create() function) but - how to correct translate it to APIC IRQ (physical irq)? > ~Andrew > -Igor _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |