[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c > > > > > index 2ae8699..0060178 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c > > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c > > > > > @@ -872,15 +872,13 @@ static unsigned long mfn_hash(unsigned long mfn) > > > > > > > > > > /* Add an MFN override for a particular page */ > > > > > int m2p_add_override(unsigned long mfn, struct page *page, > > > > > - struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *kmap_op) > > > > > + struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *kmap_op, unsigned long > > > > > pfn) > > > > > > > > Do we really need to add another additional parameter to > > > > m2p_add_override? > > > > I would just let m2p_add_override and m2p_remove_override call > > > > page_to_pfn again. It is not that expensive. > > > Yes, because that page_to_pfn can return something different. That's why > > > the > > > v2 patches failed. > > > > I am really curious: how can page_to_pfn return something different? > > I don't think is supposed to happen. > You call set_phys_to_machine before calling m2p* functions. set_phys_to_machine changes the physical to machine mapping, that would be the mfn corresponding to a given pfn. It shouldn't affect the output of page_to_pfn that returns the pfn corresponding to a given struct page. The calculation of which is based on address offsets and should be static and unaffected by things like set_phys_to_machine. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |