Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 25157: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.02.14 at 01:46, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 25157 xen-4.1-testing real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25157/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-amd64-pv           6 leak-check/basis(6)       fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl           6 leak-check/basis(6)       fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  build-amd64-oldkern           4 xen-build                 fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-pair    10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-pair      9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3  6 leak-check/basis(6)       fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64  6 leak-check/basis(6)     fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
> 
> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf      6 leak-check/basis(6)       fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel  6 leak-check/basis(6)    fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin  6 leak-check/basis(6)       fail REGR. vs. 
> 24859

Is this again fallout from some osstest of infrastructure change?
I ask because this single change:

> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  934858f00267a92bc2a2995a0c634d02d2c60fbd
> baseline version:
>  xen                  e21b2fa19946806ea27873a8808bc1ace48b7c69

can't possibly have caused this afaict.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel