[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 1/4] serial: Support OXPCIe952 aka Oxford Semiconductor Ltd Device c138 (1415:c138)
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:15:08AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 05.03.14 at 18:25, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @@ -325,11 +342,12 @@ static void __init ns16550_init_preirq(struct > > serial_port *port) > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > enum fixed_addresses idx = FIX_COM_BEGIN + (uart - ns16550_com); > > > > - set_fixmap_nocache(idx, uart->io_base); > > + set_fixmap_nocache(idx, uart->io_base + uart->offset); > > uart->remapped_io_base = (void __iomem *)fix_to_virt(idx); > > - uart->remapped_io_base += uart->io_base & ~PAGE_MASK; > > + uart->remapped_io_base += (uart->io_base + uart->offset) & > > ~PAGE_MASK; > > #else > > - uart->remapped_io_base = (char *)ioremap(uart->io_base, > > uart->io_size); > > + uart->remapped_io_base = (char *)ioremap(uart->io_base + > > uart->offset, > > + uart->io_size); > > #endif > > Looking at this again, I have a hard time seeing why you can't simply > set uart->io_base to the full, final value ... I was trying to make it obvious that it is not just io_base but also an offset. > > > @@ -701,6 +719,10 @@ pci_uart_config (struct ns16550 *uart, int skip_amt, > > int bar_idx) > > uart->lsr_mask = uart_config[i].lsr_mask; > > uart->io_base = ((u64)bar_64 << 32) | > > (bar & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK); > > + uart->offset = uart_config[i].first_offset; > > + uart->offset += bar_idx * > > uart_config[i].uart_offset; > > ... here, and drop the offset field again. But on the other hand - why even do that - when all of that can nicely be put in there with an explanation. Will rebase! Thank you again for your review! > > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |