Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/idle: update to include further package/core residency MSRs

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/idle: update to include further 
package/core residency MSRs"):
> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 10:37 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > unused fields of which will remain untouched by the hypercall.
> 
> Are you supposed to initialise them to some known sentinal or are the
> valid entries identified somewhere else (sorry, don't know much about
> x86 pm).

I see Jan has answered this.  But I think the answer should be in the
hypercall interface documentation, in the Xen public headers.

Would it be too much to ask that this hypercall be properly documented
as part of these changes ?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel