Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thursday, March 27, 2014, 1:56:11 PM, you wrote:

> This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether
> a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since
> MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of
> start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.

> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

> v2:
>  - Add BUG_ON() as suggested by Ian Campbell

>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c 
> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 438d0c0..72314c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offset, unsigned long 
> size, int head)
>          * into multiple copies tend to give large frags their
>          * own buffers as before.
>          */
> -       if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) &&
> -           (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
> +       BUG_ON(size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET);
> +       if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
>                 return true;
>  
>         return false;

Hi Paul,

Unfortunately .. no good ..

With these patches (v2) applied to 3.14-rc8 it all seems to work well,
until i do my test case .. it still chokes and now effectively permanently 
stalls network traffic to that guest.

No error messages or anything in either xl dmesg or dmesg on the host .. and 
nothing in dmesg in the guest either.

But in the guest the TX bytes ifconfig reports for eth0 still increase but RX 
bytes does nothing, so it seems only the RX path is effected)

So it now seems i now have the situation which you described in the commit 
message from "ca2f09f2b2c6c25047cfc545d057c4edfcfe561c",
"Without this patch I can trivially stall netback permanently by just doing a 
large guest to guest file copy between two Windows Server 2008R2 VMs on a 
single host."

--
Sander


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel